Seeking Yourself or Losing Yourself?
Seeking Yourself or Losing Yourself?
Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3 Between Drugs, Narratives, and Altered States of Consciousness
In recent decades, it has become increasingly common to see young people attempting to “find themselves” through intense experiences: altered states of consciousness, psychoactive substances, extreme retreats, prolonged isolation, or deep immersion in ideological or spiritual narratives. This search reflects something profoundly human—the desire to understand who we are and where we belong in the world. Yet there is a rarely discussed risk: what appears to be a journey of self-discovery can become a process in which critical thinking weakens and consciousness becomes captured by external narratives.
To understand this phenomenon, we can think in terms of three functional states of mind and body: Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3. These zones are not merely psychological concepts; they can also be perceived physiologically through heart rate, breathing patterns, and the sense of belonging to the environment in which one is situated.
Zone 1 corresponds to a state of functional tension in everyday life. The body is mobilized to perform tasks, solve problems, and deal with practical demands. Heart rate tends to be slightly elevated, breathing may become shorter or faster, and attention is oriented toward immediate objectives. This state is not inherently negative—it is necessary for productivity and survival. However, when individuals remain in this mode continuously, their capacity for deeper reflection and cognitive flexibility can diminish.
Zone 2 represents a state of fruition and critical reorganization. In this condition, heart rate tends to stabilize, breathing becomes deeper and more rhythmic, and individuals experience a sense of belonging to the place where they are. The mind becomes capable of questioning narratives, reorganizing beliefs, and integrating experiences through embodied learning. Zone 2 allows knowledge to be incorporated through lived experience rather than through abstract information alone.
Zone 3, by contrast, represents a state of narrative capture. Individuals begin to repeat beliefs or narratives rigidly, often believing they are expanding their consciousness when they are in fact reinforcing preexisting patterns. Breathing may become irregular or constrained, and there may be a subtle sense of disconnection from the surrounding environment. Emotional intensity or feelings of revelation may occur, yet critical thinking becomes impaired.
From a neurocognitive perspective, this process can be illustrated through known mechanisms of brain function. The human brain possesses systems capable of detecting inconsistencies in incoming information. One such signal is the Mismatch Negativity (MMN), which reflects the brain’s automatic detection of deviations from expected patterns. However, detecting an error does not necessarily mean correcting it. For genuine cognitive revision to occur, additional processes associated with components such as P300, N400, and P600 must be engaged. These neural markers are related to attention allocation, semantic processing, and the updating of interpretations.
When individuals become strongly captured by narratives or rigid beliefs, the brain may continue to detect anomalies through MMN, but it fails to proceed toward deeper processes of reinterpretation. In other words, the mind recognizes something unusual yet continues reinforcing the same narrative rather than revising it.
Within this framework, it becomes useful to distinguish between spirit and soul in cognitive terms. The spirit can be understood as semantic memory—the domain of cultural narratives, ideologies, beliefs, and explanatory systems. The soul, in contrast, corresponds to episodic memory, the lived and embodied experience of an individual’s life.
Problems arise when semantic narratives dominate and capture episodic experience. When this occurs, lived experience no longer reorganizes the narratives one inherits. Instead, narratives begin to dominate and interpret experience itself. In this condition we can speak of a disturbed soul, meaning an episodic self that has become constrained by rigid semantic structures.
This distinction also sheds light on the role of psychoactive substances and other modern stimuli. Drugs such as alcohol, caffeine, and sugar—as well as prolonged exposure to digital screens, excessive consumption of videos, or large quantities of books and discourses without practical integration—can temporarily alter mental states. These experiences can indeed soften rigid mental patterns. Yet flexibility is not equivalent to truth. Without embodied incorporation through real-world experience, social interaction, and reflective practice, altered states may produce confusion rather than clarity.
Human brain development depends profoundly on embodied experience. Knowledge acquired exclusively through narratives—videos, texts, ideological frameworks—without lived incorporation can accumulate as unintegrated semantic structures. In many cases, this accumulation resembles a form of cognitive intoxication, where the mind becomes saturated with narratives that have not been metabolized through experience.
Thus, the central question is not simply whether individuals are exploring altered states of consciousness, but whether such exploration leads them toward Zone 2 or Zone 3. Zone 2 involves openness, embodied awareness, and the capacity to revise beliefs. Zone 3 involves narrative rigidity, weakened critical thinking, and disconnection from the immediate environment.
Ultimately, seeking oneself does not mean escaping reality or multiplying intense experiences. It means developing the capacity to sense one’s body, breathing, heartbeat, and belonging to the territory in which one lives. It is within this integration of embodiment and reflection that the mind preserves its ability to reorganize critically.
To seek oneself is to protect the freedom of the soul.
To lose oneself is to allow narratives to replace lived experience.
References (Post-2021)
Berntson, G. G., & Khalsa, S. S. (2021). Neural circuits of interoception. Trends in Neurosciences, 44(1), 17–28.
Carhart-Harris, R., & Friston, K. (2022). REBUS and the Anarchic Brain revisited: toward a unified model of the brain action of psychedelics. Pharmacological Reviews, 74(2), 310–329.
Seth, A., & Tsakiris, M. (2023). Being a self: predictive processing and interoceptive inference. Annual Review of Psychology, 74, 271–295.
Barrett, L. F. (2022). The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of emotion. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 23, 559–571.
Uddin, L. Q. (2022). Cognitive and neural flexibility in human brain networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(8), 742–755.
Dahl, C. J., Wilson-Mendenhall, C., & Davidson, R. J. (2022). Reconstructing and deconstructing the self in altered states of consciousness. Neuron, 110(7), 1039–1056.
Friston, K., Wiese, W., & Hobson, J. A. (2022). Sentience and the origins of consciousness: predictive processing perspectives. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 132, 828–838.
Koban, L., et al. (2021). Neural mechanisms of belief updating and cognitive flexibility. Nature Communications, 12, 5890.
