Jackson Cionek
11 Views

Time as the Movement of Spaces

Time as the Movement of Spaces

A clock measures duration.

The universe reveals transformation.

The Body-Territory transforms duration into lived time.

When we look at the universe, time appears together with movement, expansion, change, and reorganization. Galaxies drift apart. Stars emerge. Planets orbit. Systems transform. Movement among spaces creates the experience of passage.

We can express this idea in a simple way:

Time is the measure of transformations between spaces.

This statement applies both to the cosmos and to human experience.

Within the Body-Territory, memories approach, images fade, emotions grow, feelings stabilize, forms of belonging reorganize, ideas emerge, and others lose strength. Every contraction, expansion, activation, and release of internal spaces generates a particular experience of time.

For this reason, Decolonial Neuroscience proposes that subjective time emerges from the movement of representational spaces active within the Body-Territory.

People often say:

“I live inside time.”

Perhaps a deeper formulation would be:

We participate in the creation of the time we live.

When attention is directed toward something, spaces become active.

When we study, spaces expand.

When we rest, spaces release energy.

When we remember, spaces reactivate.

When we forgive, spaces reorganize.

When we create, spaces that once seemed distant begin to connect.

Lived time emerges from this movement.

A student may reserve two hours to study Organic Chemistry. The clock records one hundred and twenty minutes. Yet within the Body-Territory, those two hours can generate completely different experiences.

If attention remains stable, molecular images form, structures are compared, mistakes become learning opportunities, and understanding grows, time becomes a process of knowledge construction.

If attention shifts into an endless stream of social media feeds, time becomes rapid alternation, immediate reward, fragmented curiosity, and continuous stimulation.

The clock measures the same duration.

The Body-Territory creates different times.

Here we encounter the contrast between DNA Intelligence and Technological Intelligence.

DNA Intelligence builds the body capable of sensing rhythm, duration, waiting, urgency, fatigue, calm, attention, belonging, and transformation.

Technological Intelligence measures and organizes time through clocks, calendars, alarms, notifications, metrics, schedules, and algorithms.

Technology measures duration.

The Body-Territory lives duration.

An AI system can generate a perfect study schedule. It can divide content into modules, suggest exercises, summarize concepts, and calculate productivity.

Understanding emerges when the Body-Territory transforms those representations into images, movements, memories, relationships, and qualia.

The time of learning emerges when internal spaces move in constructive ways.

This is where shared agency becomes important.

Each reader participates in the creation of their own lived time.

Every attentional choice recruits new spaces.

Every conscious pause reorganizes existing spaces.

Every sustained practice deepens certain representations.

Every excess of stimulation creates competition among multiple spaces for the same attentional resources.

Through this lens, time appears as more than an external force.

It becomes an experience emerging from the interaction between body, world, attention, technology, and movement.

This perspective resonates with recent research on time perception, interoception, emotion, working memory, and embodied cognition. Contemporary studies suggest that subjective time perception is deeply connected to bodily signals, especially cardiac and interoceptive processes, highlighting the body's role in constructing lived duration.

Research also demonstrates that representations actively maintained in working memory influence how new experiences enter perception, reinforcing the idea that what remains active shapes the experience of time itself.

EEG, fNIRS, HRV, respiration, GSR, EMG, eye-tracking, and behavioral measures help reveal the material traces of this dynamic. Recent EEG-fNIRS studies show the value of combining electrical activity and hemodynamic responses to investigate attention, cognitive control, and changing mental states.

Decolonial Neuroscience therefore proposes a practical question:

Which internal spaces are moving when we feel that time has passed?

This question transforms how we think about education, mental health, spirituality, politics, and technology.

Every system competes for time by competing for internal spaces.

A school recruits attention toward knowledge.

A social media platform recruits attention toward rapid rewards.

A religion recruits belonging and meaning.

Science recruits observation, evidence, and inquiry.

Art recruits qualia, imagination, and embodied experience.

At a deeper level, every struggle for time is a struggle for movement within the Body-Territory.

Closing Reflection

Time is the movement of spaces.

The universe generates time through the transformation of its spaces.

The Body-Territory generates lived time through the transformation of its internal spaces.

The clock records duration.

Attention moves worlds.

Every person participates in the creation of their own lived time by activating, expanding, contracting, and releasing the spaces that sustain experience.


Scientific References (Post-2021)

Khoshnoud, S. et al. (2024). Exploring the Brain–Heart Interaction during Time Perception.

Contribution:
Provides electrophysiological evidence linking cardiac processing and subjective duration judgments.


Wittmann, M. (2025). Subjective Time in Ordinary and Non-ordinary States of Consciousness.

Contribution:
Examines how bodily feelings, emotions, and states of consciousness shape subjective time.


Teng, C. et al. (2023). Assessing the Interaction Between Working Memory and Perception Through Time.

Contribution:
Demonstrates how representations maintained in working memory influence perception over time.


Bays, P. M. et al. (2024). Representation and Computation in Visual Working Memory.

Contribution:
Reviews how internally sustained representations participate in cognitive processing beyond immediate perception.


Chen, Z. et al. (2023). Open Access Dataset Integrating EEG and fNIRS During Stroop Tasks.

Contribution:
Provides multimodal EEG-fNIRS data for studying attention, cognitive control, and neural dynamics.


Ji, X. et al. (2024). EEG and fNIRS Datasets Based on Stroop Task During Two Cognitive States.

Contribution:
Offers multimodal datasets useful for investigating neural and cognitive state transitions.


Barrett, L.; Stout, D. (2024). Minds in Movement: Embodied Cognition in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.

Contribution:
Connects embodied cognition, movement, environmental interaction, and contemporary discussions about artificial intelligence.


Foundational Principle

Time is the measure of transformations between spaces.

The universe reveals time through movement.

The Body-Territory creates lived time through the expansion, contraction, activation, and release of its internal representational spaces.





#eegmicrostates #neurogliainteractions #eegmicrostates #eegnirsapplications #physiologyandbehavior #neurophilosophy #translationalneuroscience #bienestarwellnessbemestar #neuropolitics #sentienceconsciousness #metacognitionmindsetpremeditation #culturalneuroscience #agingmaturityinnocence #affectivecomputing #languageprocessing #humanking #fruición #wellbeing #neurophilosophy #neurorights #neuropolitics #neuroeconomics #neuromarketing #translationalneuroscience #religare #physiologyandbehavior #skill-implicit-learning #semiotics #encodingofwords #metacognitionmindsetpremeditation #affectivecomputing #meaning #semioticsofaction #mineraçãodedados #soberanianational #mercenáriosdamonetização
Author image

Jackson Cionek

New perspectives in translational control: from neurodegenerative diseases to glioblastoma | Brain States